View Articles

Your emails and online meetings contain most of your sensitive data: contracts, quotes, strategic discussions, and client files. They also represent your greatest point of exposure, and paradoxically, the area where regaining control delivers the highest return.

In this new installment of our series on digital sovereignty, we move from theory to practice.

The reality is clear. Every email sent through a U.S based service and every meeting hosted on a foreign platform falls under a legal jurisdiction that is not your own. Yet taking back control is far from an overwhelming task. Here's how to regain ownership of your communications, step by step, from simple actions anyone can take to solutions that genuinely keep your data under your control.

Vos emails et vos réunions concentrent l'essentiel de vos données sensibles : contrats, devis, échanges stratégiques, fichiers clients. C'est aussi là que se niche votre plus grande exposition, et paradoxalement le chantier le plus rentable à reprendre en main. Dans ce nouveau volet de notre série sur la souveraineté numérique, nous passons de la théorie à la pratique.

Car le constat est sans appel. Chaque courriel, chaque réunion qui transite par un service américain ou tenue sur une plateforme étrangère relève d'une juridiction qui n'est pas la vôtre. Pourtant, reprendre la main n'a rien d'un chantier insurmontable. Voici, étape par étape, comment retrouver la maîtrise de votre communication, du geste simple à la portée de tous jusqu'aux solutions qui gardent réellement vos données sous contrôle.

Since our first update in February, the shift toward European digital sovereignty has accelerated faster than in the previous five years. While EU powers are migrating millions of workstations to Linux and Brussels targets opaque recommendation algorithms, the push for sovereign tools is no longer a theory—it is a massive public sector transition to assume European digital sovereignty. Yet, as governments pivot, data vulnerabilities are peaking: three accounts are compromised every second, and major national hacks are exposing tens of millions, making Europe a primary target for global cyber-threats. Governments are moving, which is progress. But where does that leave those without a ministerial budget?

This fourth article explores the rapid evolution of the European regulatory landscape during the past four months and maps out the escalating threats of 2026. Most importantly, it provides a concrete action checklist—categorized by time and effort—designed for professionals who need to protect their data and their clients’ trust without a dedicated IT department. These are simple, scalable measures you can implement right now, within your means and at your own scale.

What do you actually depend on? Which devices, servers and cloud services are outside your control, and under which jurisdiction do they operate? Do you know what your staff use beyond the officially approved tools? This third article in our series on digital sovereignty provides a practical method to audit your dependencies, assess your exposure and identify the first building blocks to reclaim.

Independent alternatives exist, they are mature and the first steps are within reach without disrupting your operations. From network hardware to servers, from hosting to cybersecurity, we detail how to lay a solid infrastructure foundation, step by step, without paralysing your activity. After storming the Bastille, you need to lay the foundations of your citadel.

Europe has the laws, the labels, and the rhetoric for digital sovereignty. What it lacks is consistency. Between legislation passed and contracts signed, a stubborn gap undermines the credibility of the whole project. From government procurement to school IT, tangible progress coexists with concessions that are hard to defend. Most troubling: it is in classrooms, year after year, that an addiction to closed ecosystems is being quietly built on the taxpayer's dime.

We examine what works, what doesn't, and why coherence remains the weakest link in an otherwise ambitious strategy. Sovereign alternatives exist and are proven. The only missing ingredient is the political will to scale them, from the classroom to the data-center.

In May 2025, the International Criminal Court lost access to its email system. Not because of a cyberattack or technical failure, but because Microsoft suspended the email account of ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan after the U.S. President imposed sanctions on him. With a single executive order from Washington, an American corporation reached into a European institution based in The Hague and flipped the switch. This isn't a hypothetical scenario. This digital dependency touches everyone – even Europe's most sensitive institutions, designed to protect citizens and uphold justice, operate on American infrastructure that can be shut down instantly.

Review the events of your daily life and you'll feel dizzy. You turn on your computer, check your smartwatch, ask Siri or Alexa to play music, start your car, make a phone call, send an email, calculate a route... Each time, you go through a service, a server, a technology made in the USA. From hardware (Intel, AMD, NVIDIA) to systems (Windows, iOS, Android) to applications (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Zoom), the dependency is systemic. And your habits, your life, your information, your photos... everything that goes online is no longer yours or your company's... How did we get here?